The UWIRE Forum

Wilson, West forget free speech is a responsibility
September 14, 2009, 11:38 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized
Matt Cavedon

Matt Cavedon

Between Kanye West and Rep. Joe Wilson, Americans are finally starting to get it: free speech is a right to act responsibly, not a license for stupidity.

Last week, America saw its president called a “liar” in the middle of one of the most important speeches that he has made yet, on the floor of Congress no less. That his accuser is a duly elected member of the House of Representatives made it almost embarrassing. Granted, it could always be worse: at least our politicians are still yelling and not throwing punches, but that’s hardly a sign that we have a civilized democracy.

The immaturity of one congressman was matched by the arrogance of one hip-hop superstar at the Video Music Awards only four days later, when Kanye West seized Taylor Swift’s microphone to tell the world that Beyoncé Knowles deserved Swift’s award, setting off the biggest Facebook status storm since Michael Jackson died.

People across this country didn’t necessarily shake their heads at Wilson and West because they disagreed with what each man said, or because we don’t like dissent from authorities, whether that authority is the President or MTV. There are a lot of critics of Obamacare, and perhaps even more Beyoncé fans who would have agreed with Wilson and West under different circumstances. And, let’s face it: Americans have a proud tradition of disagreeing with powerful politicians and establishment cultural critics.

No, the real reason Americans were dismayed at the jabberers this week is that we know, on some level, that free speech deserves better than insults, mockery and stealing other people’s moments of honor.

Unlike what some postmodernists mean when they talk about their love of “art for art’s sake,” people don’t love “free speech for free speech’s sake.” We love our freedom because we all want to be able to meet our responsibilities as citizens of a democratic republic. The reason that we so jealously defend the right to free speech is not because we believe that people like Wilson, West and the KKK should be able to shoot their mouths off whenever they want. We are just uncomfortable with the thought of being punished for freely expressing our beliefs in a civil manner, and we are uncomfortable about leaving the national political dialogue to a handful of politicians, pundits and special interests.

We want freedom because we want to be able to live up to our duties. As Lord Acton, the nineteenth century historian of freedom, put it: “Liberty is not the power of doing what we like, but the right to do what we ought.” We all know that we oughtn’t interrupt each other and resort to name-calling. We all know that Wilson and West were not men enjoying their liberty; they were fools taking advantage of our cultural willingness to accept whatever comes out of people’s mouths.

Ultimately, nothing tangible will come of Wilson’s and West’s childish outbreaks.

If, however, these unfortunate incidents get Americans to think twice about why we have freedom, and about the differences between liberty and indulgence, then this can serve as a lesson about the purpose of rights.

We all know that there was something wrong about the two biggest news-grabbing gaffes over the last few days. Now, let’s take it to the next step and get back our ability to discriminate between what is morally justifiable as free speech and what is just dumb blather, what is freedom well-used and what is just superfluous.

Matt Cavedon is a senior at Harvard University.


3 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Matt, I think you are absolutely wrong on the issue of Joe Wilson. Your characterization of Wilson’s outburst as an “insult”, “mockery” or “stealing other people’s moments of honor” is way off base. When he told the president he was lying, Obama was, in fact, lying. Is it more insulting to call out a lie than to take an entire speech lying about health care reform? Is it mockery? And in this republic, a policy speech to a joint session of Congress isn’t exactly a moment of honor.

Was the outburst a bit rude? Yes, but so what? This is American politics, not the debutante ball. A little rough and tumble rhetorical drama never hurt anyone, but you make it seem like its an affront to liberty whenever anyone acts out. Was “you lie” any worse than Harry Reid calling then-President Bush a liar? I mention that not for the sake of playing “they do it too!” but to point out that this isn’t some new development in our politics.

And if you want to talk about “unfortunate incidents” between politicians, how about in 1856, when Senator Charles Sumner was physically attacked with a cane by Rep. Preston Brooks in the Senate chamber. I can’t really muster any outrage over a tiny little outburst that ruined our president’s class presentation.

As for something tangible coming out of Wilson’s outbreak, how about the hundreds of thousands of dollars his reelection campaign has raked in? How about the attention to the actual lie–that illegal aliens won’t be covered under the public option (the bill says they won’t, but there’s a loophole that history tells us will be exploited)? How about all the protesters at Saturday’s march on DC that carried signs of support for Wilson’s message and were energized by his willingness to say what many of us would like to say to Obama when he lies about health care?

But I agree, Kanye’s a douche.

Comment by Michael Warren

The Government Accountability Office says that the only loophole is one that won’t block illegal immigrants from buying health insurance on the national exchanges that most current reform bills would establish. Each bill bars illegal immigrants from receiving public funding for getting health insurance.

My point isn’t that Wilson or Obama are lying; it’s that this is complicated. Shouting “You lie!” on the floor of Congress is about as mature as most Code Pink marches, and about as substantive as a Michael Moore flick. It’s one thing to suggest that the President is lying in a crappy documentary, or even on cable news. It’s something entirely different to interrupt a major policy speech by the President in Congress.

Protocol matters, and manners count for something. Wilson is not the type of voice that is going to get the GOP back into the good graces of the Northeast, Midwest, Big West, and Upper South. He’s the kind of speaker who looks like he’s throwing a temper tantrum. Save it for the protests, Mr. Representative – intemperate anger doesn’t belong in formal political debate.

Comment by cavedog14

[…] West, Wilson Forget Free Speech is a Responsibility In Uncategorized on September 16, 2009 at 4:57 pm (Cross-posted by Fox News and UWIRE) […]

Pingback by West, Wilson Forget Free Speech is a Responsibility « The Weekly Filibuster

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: